Weekly Commentary – September 25, 2017


Matthew E. Peterson Chief Wealth Strategist, LPL Financial

In its September 20 policy statement, the Federal Reserve (Fed) suggested that it will increase interest rates once more this year and three times in 2018. But the market is predicting that the Fed will only raise rates two times between now and the end of 2018—and it isn’t even certain that the Fed will raise rates this December, though according to fed fund futures it is likely. One reason for this skepticism is the Fed’s history of being overly aggressive in estimating its own future actions.

The market accepts that both the Fed and the Bank of England (BOE) are likely to raise rates this year. However, it also questions comments made by the European Central Bank (ECB) regarding its possible normalization of monetary policy. In fact, it thinks that the ECB and Bank of Japan (BOJ) are more than a year away from raising their rates, suggesting continued divergence among global central banks.


The Fed has evolved how it communicates both current and future interest rate policy to the financial markets. The first Fed statement on changes to monetary policy was issued after its February 1994 meeting; prior to that, the market had to discern Fed policy from its actions. The Fed began to release a more explicit look at future monetary policy in January 2012, publishing the so-called “dot plots,” a graph displaying the midpoint of the range of interest rate projections of each member of the Fed’s Board of Governors. Since its introduction, the dot plots have been one of the most scrutinized, and criticized,  aspects of monetary policy.

The Fed’s September 20 dot plot indicates that in aggregate, members believe that rates will be 25 basis points (0.25%) higher by the end of this year and 100 basis points (1%) higher by the end of 2018, equating to four rate hikes over the next 15 months. But based upon futures contracts, the market thinks that the Fed will be less aggressive, pricing in only two interest rate increases over this period. The gap between the dot plot and the market grows in the forecasts for 2019 [Figure 1].

Why is there such a divergence? Isn’t the Fed in the best position to know what the interest rate will be since it’s responsible for setting it? It turns out that the Fed is a relatively poor predictor of its future actions. Or more formally, we can say that the Fed has misjudged what the appropriate monetary policy for the future will be [Figure 2]. In December 2014, the Fed thought that the appropriate fed funds rate in December 2017 would be 3.6%, and by December 2015 it had adjusted its projection to 2.4%. The fed funds rate, however, is currently 1.25%, with the expectation that it will be 1.5% by year-end following an anticipated December 2017 rate hike. Similarly, the Fed’s anticipation of interest rates in the “longer run” — or when the Fed thinks it will stop adjusting interest rates for the current economic cycle — has also decreased by 1% since the end of 2014.

The primary reason that the Fed has delayed anticipated rate increases is because inflation has been much lower than anticipated. The Fed does not see inflation reaching its 2% target until 2019. We looked at inflation in last week’s Weekly Economic Commentary. A faster rise in inflation might cause the Fed to meet its current forecast for rate hikes, or even accelerate them. However, based on the data since the dot plots began to be published, the Fed has erred on the side of caution in raising rates, even relative to its own predictions. The market comes by its skepticism honestly.


The Fed only publishes the dot plots four times a year. In contrast, the market for fed funds futures trades daily, and can be quite volatile, especially around Fed meetings and other major economic events. The markets also make similar predictions regarding other major central bank interest rate policies [Figure 3]. Before the recent Fed meeting, the market was indicating a 25% chance of a December 2017 rate increase. Following the meeting, that probability went up to 65%. Looking at the BOE, the market is showing a 75% chance of a rate increase. Therefore, although it’s not certain, the market believes that it is more likely than not that both the Fed and the BOE will increase interest rates at their respective December 2017 meetings.

For contrast, we show the similar market-implied probabilities for the ECB and BOJ for interest rate increases by the end of 2018. This chart for the end of 2017 would effectively be a straight line at zero. Not only does the market think that the odds of interest rate hikes are low over the next 15 months, it has become more pessimistic regarding the probabilities for these central banks since this summer.


Global financial markets pay close attention to every statement from central banks, even if they do not always take the statements at face value. At the very least, these statements provide some guidance as to the general direction of monetary policy, even if the speed at which that policy is implemented is inaccurate. We can see the increasing divergence between the tightening policies expected in the U.S. and U.K. and the continued ultra-loose monetary policy expected from the rest of Europe and Japan.


The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing.

All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.

Because of its narrow focus, specialty sector investing, such as healthcare, financials, or energy, will be subject to greater volatility than investing more broadly across many sectors and companies.

All investing involves risk including loss of principal.


The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL financial LLC is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC or NCUA/NCUSIF Insured | No Bank or Credit Union Guarantee | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by Any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit