Weekly Commentary – October 30, 2017


John Lynch Chief Investment Strategist, LPL Financial

Jeffrey Buchbinder, CFA Equity Strategist, LPL Financial

With Halloween upon us, we continue our tradition of writing about what might scare markets. While too much fear during stressful times for markets can lead to poor investment decisions, some skepticism in strong markets can be healthy. With that in mind, here are five risks that have the potential to scare markets. We also want to point out, however, that these worries do not change our generally positive outlook. We continue to expect further stock gains for this bull market in the coming year, although potentially with an increase in market volatility.


The economic expansion officially hit 100 months old this month and is now the third longest since WWII [Figure 1]. Meanwhile, the bull market is the second longest at 8.5 years old. Some believe this alone means that the U.S. economy may soon slide into a recession and end this powerful bull market. But bull markets don’t die of old age, they die of economic excesses, and we aren’t seeing the types of excesses observed at previous economic peaks.

We follow a variety of leading economic indicators to help identify possible signs of overheating. The types of excesses that have ended prior economic expansions and bull markets (overspending, overborrowing, overconfidence) remain well contained at this time. Bottom line: We see a low probability of a recession in the next 12 to 18 months, although there is always the chance of an unexpected exogenous geopolitical shock or policy mistake.


Billionaire investor Warren Buffett famously told investors to “be fearful when others are greedy.” Remember, sentiment is a powerful tool at the extremes. When everyone is bullish there is likely no one left to buy, and vice versa when everyone is bearish.

We would classify sentiment as a near-term concern, as there are some signs of greed in the market currently:

  • In a recent University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey, nearly 65% of those polled expected the stock market to be higher a year from now, which is the most in the survey’s 15-year history.
  • The Investors Intelligence U.S. Advisors Sentiment Report — a widely used contrarian indicator — showed a spread of 47% between bulls and bears, the widest spread since 1987 [Figure 2].
  • A recent fund manager survey from Bank of America found that expectations for “Goldilocks” (above-trend growth, below-trend inflation) were at a record high.

Although these data points suggest overly positive sentiment, it is important to note that we aren’t seeing huge flows into equities that might suggest a major peak. According to the Investment Company Institute, in 2017 there have been more than $43 billion in outflows from domestic equity strategies, versus over $330 billion into bond products. In other words, investors might be saying one thing and doing another with their money.











We have written a lot about how the stock market has been so calm this year. Last week marked the 242nd consecutive trading day without a 3% correction for the S&P 500 Index, topping the record of 241 days set in 1995. The index hasn’t experienced a 5% correction since the Brexit vote (June 27, 2016). Now at 338 trading days, this marks the fourth longest streak since 1958, and could become the longest during the last 60 years if it lasts until February 2018. Looking at volatility another way, 1964 was the last time we last saw smaller average daily changes in the S&P 500 than the 0.3% we have observed so far in 2017.

The extremely low volatility is a bit concerning. Although the absence of a pullback does not predict that one will come soon, we do believe that one may be due. Pullbacks are a normal part of markets; historically, on average, a few occur each year. Although we can’t necessarily forecast when the next one might come, or the precise cause, the odds do favor a dip in the near future.


History tells us that the Federal Reserve (Fed) tightening cycles can accelerate the ends of business cycles and bull markets. Several factors increase the risk associated with the current cycle:

  • The Fed is undertaking an unprecedented shrinking of its massive $4.5 trillion balance sheet.
  • We will likely have a new Fed chair in February 2018 (to be announced later this week), and that new chair could potentially be more hawkish than Chair Yellen. Past leadership transitions at the Fed have been accompanied by increases in market volatility.
  • Europe and Japan have similarly sized balance sheets as the Fed. While Europe has only just begun to taper and Japan is probably not close to starting, these policy divergences could cause volatility in equity and currency markets.

While these transitions for central banks present risk to markets, we believe that the Fed’s transparency increases the likelihood that markets are able to digest tighter monetary policies relatively smoothly. We also expect the Fed to continue to move gradually, regardless of who is running it, reducing the likelihood that the central bank spooks markets as it did in 2013, the origin of the term “taper tantrum.” Look out for more from us on central banks in LPL Research’s Outlook 2018 next month.


The stock market appears to be pricing in a reasonable chance that the Republicans may achieve at least a corporate tax cut. Whether they get full reform or just a tax cut is hard to say, though the delineation here is gray. Although the House passed a 2018 budget resolution last week, which moves the process along, there is a real risk that Congress may be unable to pass a tax bill.

There is a reason why comprehensive tax reform hasn’t happened since 1986 — it’s hard to do. George W. Bush passed tax cuts in 2001 and 2003 — those are easier and more common — but today’s political environment appears tougher to navigate. Seeing the House’s comprehensive proposal later this week may help the handicappers.

It is difficult to know just how much of this year’s strong stock market gains are due to potential tax deal optimism; therefore, it’s equally difficult to pinpoint how negative the market’s reaction will be if a deal isn’t reached. Regardless, failure to reach any kind of a deal would likely cause stocks to pull back.

We believe that the odds of a tax cut (or reform) are over 50%. The Republican Party is largely unified on the issue, there are many different levers that can be pulled to secure needed votes, and dynamic scoring is likely to be used to limit the deficit impact. Dynamic scoring allows higher economic growth forecasts from lower tax rates to be used to calculate the budget impact of a tax bill.


Seeing a list of these factors that may scare markets could make some of you nervous, but the fundamentals still look quite good to us. Economic momentum has picked up, the job market remains healthy and is essentially at full employment, and earnings growth is solid with potential upside from a tax cut. Bottom line: We maintain our expectation for further gains for stocks in the coming year, despite these potential risks.*

We hope everyone has a fun and safe Halloween. And remember, a little fear is healthy for protection, but too much fear can distract us from our long-term goals.

Thank you to Ryan Detrick for his contributions to this report.

*As noted in our Midyear Outlook 2017: A Shift In Market Control, we expect the S&P 500 Index total return to be 6 – 9%, driven by 1) a pickup in U.S. economic growth; 2) mid- to high-single-digit earnings gains; 3) a stable price-to-earnings ratio (PE) of 19 – 20; and 4) prospects for a fiscal policy boost to earnings in 2018.


The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing.

All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.

Because of its narrow focus, specialty sector investing, such as healthcare, financials, or energy, will be subject to greater volatility than investing more broadly across many sectors and companies.

All investing involves risk including loss of principal.


The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial LLC is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC or NCUA/NCUSIF Insured | No Bank or Credit Union Guarantee | May Lose Value | Not Guaranteed by Any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit